@item Consultant:
LilyPond is sometimes critized for not listening to users, but
whenever we ask for opinions about specific issues, we never get
-enough feedback. This is somewhat aggrevating.
+enough feedback. This is somewhat aggravating.
We need a group of users to make a dedicated effort to test and
give feedback. If there's new documentation, read it. If there's
an experimental binary, download it and try compiling a score with
We currently have a mix of official GNU mailing lists and lilynet
lists. Is there a strong rationale for having separate mailing
list servers? Why not pick one place, and put all our lists there?
-(or at least, all "permenant" lists?)
+(or at least, all "permanent" lists?)
(prep: 1 hour. discuss: 5 hours)
@@lilypond[verbatim,quote,relative=1]
@end example
+Please avoid using extra spacing either after or within the
+@code{@@lilypond} parameters.
+
+@example
+not: @@lilypond [verbatim, quote, relative=1]
+but instead: @@lilypond[verbatim,quote,relative=1]
+@end example
+
If you want to use @code{\layout@{@}} or define variables, use
@example