release: 1.5.25

[lilypond.git] / Documentation / bibliography / computer-notation.bib

diff --git a/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib b/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
index c5a25053716ff1fcc998f175776406fbfa30aaba..b368d6fc30e7ae663b528254eeda051f35582797 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
+++ b/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
@@ -534,18 +534,14 @@ surprising that LilyPond is more mature.
   pages={47--61},
 }
 
-
-
 @Article {tablature-web,
   note = {FAQ (with answers) about TAB, the ASCII variant of Tablature. HWN},
   title = {how to read and write tab: a guide to tab notation},
   author = {Howard Wright},
   email={Howard.Wright@ed.ac.uk},
-  HTML={http://www.guitartabs.cc/tabfaq.shtml}
-%  HTML={http://wabakimi.carleton.ca/~phacket2/guitar/tabfaq.html},
+  url={http://www.guitartabs.cc/tabfaq.shtml},
 }
 
-
 @Article {niff-web,
   note = {Specs for NIFF, a reasonably comprehensive but binary (yuk) format for notation HWN},
 
@@ -557,7 +553,6 @@ surprising that LilyPond is more mature.
   ftp = {ftp://blackbox.cartah.washington.edu}
 }
 
-
 @Article {smdl-web,
   author={unknown},
   title = {SMDL, Standard Musical Description Language},
@@ -656,18 +651,11 @@ general rules, similar to\cite{parrish87-simultaneities}},
 note = {Placement of accidentals crystallised in an enormous set of
 rules.  Same remarks as for \cite{grover89-twovoices} applies} }
 
-@TechReport{,
+@TechReport{droettboom00:_study_notat_descr_languag,
   author =      {Michael Droettboom},
   title =       {Study of music Notation Description Languages},
-  year =        {2000},
-  OPTkey =      {},
-  OPTvolume =   {},
-  OPTnumber =   {},
-  OPTpages =    {},
-  OPTmonth =    {},
-  OPTnote =     {},
-  OPTannote =   {}
-html= {http://gigue.peabody.jhu.edu/~mdboom/format.pdf}
+  year =        2000,
+url= {http://gigue.peabody.jhu.edu/~mdboom/format.pdf},
 annote ={Author compares GUIDO and lilypond. LilyPond wins on practical issues as usability and availability of tools, GUIDO wins on implementation simplicity.}
 }