-contacted them. We (the GNU Music project people and us, LilyPond
-people) agreed that cooperation would be desirable. Although merging
-of both efforts is technically infeasible at this point, we did decide
-that LilyPond should also be part of the GNU Music project (when it is
-really released).
-
-In summary, LilyPond is part of the GNU project, and part of the (yet
-to be created) GNU Music project. LilyPond 's existence does not mean
-that other efforts for free music tools have come to a halt. In
-particular, the following document is entirely mine, and is not meant
-to reflect anyone else's opinion.
+contacted them.
+
+What was left of the GMP (Robert Strandh) and us, LilyPond people,
+agreed that cooperation would be desirable. Although merging of both
+efforts was and is technically infeasible, we did decide that LilyPond
+should also be part of the GNU Music project.
+
+Only later did I discover the previous quarrels about the GMP-"take
+1". To show that I am aware of the history, and to make sure nobody
+gets me wrong or is angry at me because I stole a project or a
+project's name, I wrote this note.
+
+In summary, LilyPond is now the only substantial embodiment of the GNU Music
+Project, and it is part of the GNU project.
+
+For completeness' sake, I will mention the other efforts here:
+
+=over 4
+
+=item G Sharp, http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~strandh/Gsharp
+
+An alpha version notation editor for X in Scheme. Source available on
+request.
+
+=item GNU music,
+
+An alpha version of a music editing system with Musictex
+output. Pretest versions of GNU Music (v0.3) can still be obtained from
+Francois Pinard.
+
+=back
+
+This history note is probably biased in some way, because I wrote it.
+The rest of this document is also entirely mine, and is not meant to
+reflect anyone else's opinion.