\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
-\begin{frame}[label={sec:org91072ee}]{Picking options}
-\begin{center}
-Constitutionally, we are asked to \emph{break ties} amongst available
-options \vfill
+\begin{frame}{What this means}
+
+Picking options
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Constitutionally, we are asked to \emph{break ties} amongst available
+options
-After all efforts to solve it via consensus have been \emph{tried and
+\item After all efforts to solve it via consensus have been \emph{tried and
failed}
-\end{center}
-\end{frame}
+\end{itemize}
+\vfill
+Offer advice and make our views known
+\begin{itemize}
+\item We can offer advice at any point, but it's just advice.
+\end{itemize}
-\begin{frame}[label={sec:org5082c16}]{Offer advice and make our views known}
-\begin{center}
-The TC can offer \alert{you} advice.
-\end{center}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[label={sec:org9fed62f}]{The Debian Technical Committee is a\ldots{}}
\begin{itemize}
\item Escalations need to be done as last resort, which means that discussions have turned into a flamewar by the time they reach us.
-\item A lot of people resent the TC and will straight away refuse to talk to us.
+\item Some developers resent the TC and will straight away refuse to talk to us.
-\item Our main power is to overrule and as such people resent us.
+\item Our main power is to overrule and as such people fear or dislike us.
\item It can take months until we make a decision, sometimes this means it's already too late.
+
+\item Having a discussion in the open leads to exhausting flamewars.
\end{itemize}
\end{center}